Articulation

 

and yet, absurdly they call the individual ‘MAD’, as in turn, the psychologist, as in soliloquy, they accept wait large, psychologically speaking,?;

so philosophically, the schism we impose, is simplistic, and change only comes when it does not want, so eventently, change, in the context of amelioration, it is made reprehensible by society, then conversely, madness, can be contextually defined, and it should be ascended why do you want better?; so madness, if applicable, is a diffrent teleology, and tautology, as an end with meaning, and, if that is refused, then what is not the question, but why is so, from which the ‘MAD’ cannot reply, philosophically speaking?; but in truth, philosophically educated as taught can, so ‘madness’ is to accept the social malaise, and they propagate is so.

Psychologically Speaking

Why bold ?
It’s appropriate
part four of four